Helium.com just rejected one of my articles called A Case of Family Murder because it was too graphic! The story is a first-person account of a man who killed his children and two women in a single day. He is a terrific narrator and anyone who wants to know what goes on in the minds of perpetrators will learn a great deal from this story.
My dilemma all along has been the graphic nature of the life stories I have collected from perpetrators of violence. I began wanting to understand how they think. I now know. I have been stuck for years figuring out how to present my material so others will read it. I have been afraid of accusations of exploitation.
I look at Criminal Minds, a TV show, and even some CSIs and I think they sometimes have no idea what is going on. They play to old tired plots rather than taking a good look at what perpetrators really think.
Darn, darn, darn. Does anyone have any idea how I can present phenomenological research on violence so other people will read it and learn from it?
Friday, June 15, 2007
Saturday, May 5, 2007
Welcome, Everyone
Good morning. This blog is a place to post material related to qualitative research. I have many ideas that I would like comments on and that I would like to figure out how to organize. Please join the conversation.
best wishes,
Jane Gilgun
Professor
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA
blog:fionaspeaks.blogspot.com
onbeingashit.blogspot.com
email: jgilgun@umn.edu
best wishes,
Jane Gilgun
Professor
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA
blog:fionaspeaks.blogspot.com
onbeingashit.blogspot.com
email: jgilgun@umn.edu
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)